Ethical dilemmas Free Essay Example, 1500 words

Gillison et al. (2012) assert that the main reason for vaccination is the benefit that it has to the entire population. In this regard, immunization of children offers no apparent benefit to the children themselves but to the greater society. Although the federal guidelines do not necessitate approval before immunization, the "National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986" necessitates that health care practitioners issue the vaccine recipients or their parents and guardians with a vaccine information statement that offers information on the risks and benefits and other information that may be used to assist in making informed decision (Patel, 2009). Lawmakers and patient rights advocates hold that an assent is ethical and suitable so that parents are knowledgeable about vaccines, and have passable time ask questions (Patel, 2009). Ohri (2007) denotes that HPV mandatory vaccination violates the rights of the parents in rearing their young ones, particularly on the sexual conduct of the young ones. Some parents have argued that vaccinating the children for a sexually infectious disease at such a tender age gives the children an implied consent to take part in risky sexual behaviors. We will write a custom essay sample on Ethical dilemmas or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Nonetheless, there has not been any evidence put forth to support this argument. Moreover, this vaccination has portrayed that adolescents are rather unaware of HPV and that the fear to contract any STI has petite effect on their choice to engage in sex or not (Patel, 2009). Further refutation of violation of the parent’s autonomy centers on a cost-benefit ethical review. The primary question here is how much parental control is lost because of the obligatory vaccination. According to Ohri (2007), this seems to be a small price that the parents have to pay for averting a dreadful infection that causes deaths of women and distress among millions of women with precancerous wounds from multiple procedures. The advantage of the HPV vaccine comes under the ethic of employing conventional medical technology to avoid severe infections whenever possible, in order to reduce suffering and pain. Notably, vaccines have been believed to excellently avert severe infections from among people, and unlike cervical cancer, some of these diseases have effective treatments but yet vaccination is believed to be essential. Vamos et al. (2008) acknowledge that the significance of vaccines that avert cancer infections ought to be comparatively obvious, and, therefore, the HPV vaccination is the primary public health landmark.